Blog

I could have written that same paragraph in one of my articles. But I would mean something very different. In their mind, the True world is the evening news–the suffering, despair, fighting, and disease. It’s not pretty. It’s win-lose at it’s best; it rests firmly on the foundation of good and evil.  I wouldn’t even call that the real world since it’s just the product of illusion.  It’s a projection of beliefs.  It’s definitely not true.  But if we look deep within our mind, we can find beliefs that resonate with Alinsky.

The Alinsky illusion is the True world of initiation.  But to him, a world without problems and suffering is pie in the sky. Life without problems, according to Alinsky, is only possible when Hollywood decides to create it in a television program.  He also talks about good and evil being just the way it is. Everything Alinsky considers real and true, I expose as illusion or false. We seem to be opposites in perspective.  But you can’t see that unless you really pay attention to what he is saying.  The words we use are the pretty much the same.

This is why I’m such a ridiculous perfectionist about language, and why I go into so much detail. This is also why people listen to any guru or spiritual teacher, and they believe that they are saying the same thing as I am.  But perhaps you can see from this example that what the gurus and spiritual teachers say has the right words used wrongly, just like Alinsky.  It’s level confusion.

So can you see?  Alinsky and I are not opposites, saying the same words.  What Alinsky is saying is 100 percent false because he is talking from the physical perspective as if it is the true perspective.  It is a common way of getting around projection in the illusion.  What I’m saying is 100 percent accurate.  False is not the opposite of true.  False isn’t real; it’s powerless.  It doesn’t really exist.  When you lose your belief in false, you are left with truth (without opposite).  So Alinsky’s Democratic Philosophy movement must be radical because it must convince people to abandon the True Self for an illusion of suffering.  It’s just the new version of the Old Testament God’s plan.

The Democratic Philosophy, according to Alinsky, is all about peace, justice, equality, tolerance, and quality of life for all. It sounds great; except it’s viewed as an impossible dream. They expect that we know that; so we don’t hold high expectations for our politicians.  In other words, when they go high, it’s pie-in-the-sky, it’s a lie.  But we listen to their words of hope, and we think they are actually going to take us there.  We can’t imagine they would be talking about something that they don’t even believe to be possible.  They can’t. They believe in a very troubled world. In fact, they believe in a world of constant revolution and suffering.  Thus, they refer to themselves as organizers.  Their chaotic world needs organizing, according to Alinsky.

Organizing

Think about the concept of organizing.  It’s only necessary if you perceive something as chaotic.  Organizing is logical and useful in the physical illusion.  Why do we organize our desk?  We consider it messy.  We can’t find things we need.  We need more space to work.  Lots of paper makes sense, and can be dealt with, if our bills are in one pile and our current projects are in another.  If not, we are confused and inefficient.  We don’t get much done.  Organizing belongs in the physical world.  It’s a useful belief.  But it’s not true.  Our True Self is nonphysical; it doesn’t see organizing as necessary.

Think about a pure mind.  We’d only have in it what we need.  In truth, there is no required file structure to our mind.  We just think of what we desire or want, and the answer pops into our mind instantly.  When our mind is not cluttered and filled with crap, it is very efficient and powerful.  It is also creative; a computer is not creative.  It is just a memory machine with lots of files since it has no True Self.  This is what Alinsky had to say about creation.

The ego of the organizer is stronger and more monumental than the ego of the leader. The leader is driven by the desire for power, while the organizer is driven by the desire to create. The organizer is in a true sense reaching for the highest level for which man can reach—to create, to be a “great creator,” to play God.

He says words in a very powerful way.  Yes, we do desire to become a creator, but not in the lives of others.  A desire for power is to create in the lives of others; that is what organizers do.  Again, he takes something that is true, and he uses it to support his game in the illusion.  Thus, it becomes false.  If we just listen to his words, we will be deceived into thinking he is a wonderful teacher.  Many have done that.  The Liberal party is filled with people who have level confusion.  When we take words that apply to the True Self perspective, and we put them into the illusion, we have deception.  We have the occult point of view.

Once we have beliefs in our mind, now we have files of data.  We have to keep those damn files organized, or we’ll serve pork to our Jewish friends and serve a burger to our vegan friends.  If we take the idea of organizing and apply it to people, we all get along better in the illusion.  We’d put the Christians in one country and the Muslims in another.  Blacks would live on one continent and whites on another.  If we mix everyone up, we get confusion in the illusion.  It’s that way because of beliefs.  If we lived from our True Selves, we could all be mixed without incident.  But again, this is a place of extreme liberal-level confusion.  Open borders only work if you first eliminate beliefs.  Then you need no divisions.  If you honor beliefs, you need borders.  Or else, you will fight over who’s beliefs are the right beliefs.

So organizing is a way of dealing with differences…differences created by beliefs.  But to deal with differences, you have to make a big ass deal out of differences.  So Liberals follow Democratic Philosophy, and they whine about diversity all the time.  They pretend to be accepting, but accepting would really be not separating people into groups at all.  Even skin color is only a difference when the false self is running.  The True Self doesn’t see it as a difference, much like the way we treat hair or eye color.  It doesn’t mean anything.  If you don’t look closely, you miss the level confusion.  Let’s back up so we don’t get stuck in Alinsky’s physical world.

Organizing is about the physical.  We get differences in our lives because our beliefs create those differences.  Our beliefs are sorted into files:  race, religion, culture, political view, sex, sexual preference, etc.  The false mind now produces the physical reality we see and live.  If we apply this physical concept of organizing to our mind, and treat a human mind like a piece of paper on our desk, then we take a concept that only belongs in the physical into the mental.  We think that our mind has to be partitioned into ways of behaving…much like multiple personalities.  After all, we must be different with our Muslim, black friend than we are with our Christian, white friend.  Can you see what happens?  In Alinsky’s world, we are organizing our mind like we organize our messy desk.

In a way, our desk is more enlightened.  Our bills don’t get upset at our projects in process or calendar for being different.  They just exist in their space until we want to do something with them.  This is the proper way to treat something or someone who is unconsciously stuck in the illusion.  You let them sit their asses in their space until you see a reason to deal with them.  It’s sad, but practical.  It works.

Alinsky’s organizing is about separating people into groups, like paper.  The Democratic Philosophy of organizing treats people as they are labeled or after they reap the effects of their beliefs (such as one labeled homeless because his beliefs caused him to lose his home).  The True Self is completely ignored.  Letting go is completely ignored.

Given this flawed perception, the Alinsky organizers tell people how to behave and speak so that no separate group is offended.  They separate, and then they act as if they didn’t separate.  The fact that they have organized negates, in their warped mind, the separation.  They act like the organizing has cancelled out the separation, returning life back to perfection.  Metaphorically, they push all the papers into the center of the desk, but still keep them separate.  You can do that with paper and paperclips.  Try to paperclip people; it doesn’t go very well.  People move about.  They don’t stay where you put them.  But Alinsky isn’t concerned that the paper doesn’t stay where you put it.  He says that conflict is essential.  He almost makes it sound good or divinely orchestrated.  It would be if it pushed us to let go, but that is nowhere in his philosophy.

Conflict is the essential core of a free and open society. If one were to project the democratic way of life in the form of a musical score, its major theme would be the harmony of dissonance.

This tolerate differences (after completely focusing on the differences) mentality creates people pleasers who are constantly looking outward to see how they should behave.  Outward focus means we are defined by others.  We are using their discrimination, which is highly flawed, to determine what we say or do.  We become the effect of their projections.  It’s hard work to live this way.  If we don’t like what they are projecting on us (or desire for us), we will be miserable in the Alinsky world model.

Look at life after the 2016 Presidential Election for the Liberals.  They are completely focused outward.  They think the world is ending, and they can’t see that it isn’t.  They are scared of their own mental projection because they have separated and organized everyone. They can’t see that the Republicans aren’t feeling any separation at all.  In fact, I’m astounded as I watch my twitter feed.  Young, old, black, white, Asian, Hispanic, gay, and straight people for Trump are all having one big party.  There is a real power behind the movement.  As the Liberals slammed another recount or fake story at the Trump train, it slowly lost it’s power.  It is exactly what the liberals say they want, but they can’t have it themselves.  They also can’t see that it is occurring in the Trump people, who have elected a leader, not an organizer.  We can’t say for sure if Trump has a mentor influencing him, but he doesn’t act that way.  He seems to say whatever comes to mind without any regard for people pleasing.

Given that Trump is not that religious, and would not be projecting Satan on the Liberals, it seems that their motive and return projection was exposed.  We can now see how divided the party really was under the Alinsky formula.  We can’t see the reality of a group of people when we are projecting on them. But when we stop, we see them for who they are.  Often we are shocked by what we see.

False has no power among truly united people.  It is a lot like I described in the story of the Tower of Babel in reverse.  Now the people are uniting again, and becoming more powerful than the elite.  They are building a tower…Trump Tower, perhaps?

But many people pleasers get their false sense of self esteem from their ability to please others.  So they feel good in the Alinsky world.  They don’t want to leave it or dissolve it because it works for them.

Liberals are plagued by the notion of people pleasing, looking politically and socially correct.  They say what makes them sound like a good person, not what they actually believe.  Thus, we feel the incongruence.  This is why you have so many conspiracy theorists focused on Hillary.  They are desperately looking for reasons that explain what they feel.

People pleasers feel superior in that illusion.  They are viewed as good, tolerant spiritual people by most others.  They aren’t looking at the big picture.  They are in win-lose, but they are so accepted in their world that anyone who challenges their world view has gone rogue.  They believe that if everyone thought like them, the world would be right.  But it wouldn’t be.  They are confused; so their way of perceiving the world, if widely adapted, would just lead to more confusion.  It would just lead to a more solid and impenetrable illusion.

I was once very confused by this.  I almost wished that I could be a people pleaser.  It seemed they had something I didn’t have.  It was only when I stepped into win-win that I could see their error.  They had no concept of win-win.  They were actually quite selfish.

People pleasers are always trying to look calm, and to keep others calm.  That’s why they say what is politically correct; don’t offend anyone is their plastic rule.  Staying calm to them means being kind, tolerant, and socially correct to people who are false.  Since most people are false, they feel like they are one with most people.  But false selves are not meant to be one; and that is what causes Socialism and Communism to be very ineffective.  People separate with beliefs; you can’t treat them all the same once they naturally divide.

This strange, but very common clone leader (or organizer), causes confusion to the outsiders of their illusion because they look kind of like a True Self; but when you listen to them, you realize they are not.  They are only calm when we obey their illusion…saying or doing what they consider right.  They want to hear their words repeated verbatim.  That way there is no conflict.

Thus, if we expose their illusion, they become very upset.  The truth is a threat to their illusion (or any illusion).  That’s too damn bad.  If people would let go, or if they would at least realize that beliefs are all a product of the false self, and they only affect the believer’s life, then no organizing would be necessary.  We’d all connect at the True Self level all the time.  We’d connect at the false self level only when it is mutually useful or fun to do so.  We would not force others with different beliefs to follow our beliefs.  We’d leave them alone.

This leaves the door open for people to be themselves.  The idea of open borders is also level confusion.  You would have personal open borders if you didn’t have beliefs.  Projection would not scare you.  It would not stick.  Beliefs by their nature create borders.

If the true life (as defined by initiation) is held as an impossible dream, as they believe in Democratic Philosophy; and it is used only in speeches to inspire, then when a leader doesn’t succeed in creating that or even encouraging that, they didn’t fail.  They were simply up against some big challenges that will never go away.  They manage the chaos, but they never fix anything.  Perfection is impossible.

We hear this in Obama as his reign comes to an end.  He says that he did great things.  He was just misunderstood.

You can see this in Hillary Clinton’s after-election behavior.  She never stops giving reasons for why she lost.  She blames everyone but herself.  Responsibility is not part of Alinsky’s Democratic Philosophy.

Alinsky also never uses the word leader in his Democratic Philosophy.  Leadership implies responsibility.  He doesn’t have a sense of responsibility in his teaching; he sees people like cattle that you push around and use to get what you believe is best for all.  There is no win-win in the Alinsky model.  He sees a win-lose world.  If we all are mushed together in one united world, then we are forced to tolerate even more beliefs.  When we become tolerant of beliefs, or false, we accept more rules.  When we accept more rules, we become more obedient to authority.  We stop thinking for ourselves; we are a complete pawn of the illusion.

This is supreme level confusion, whereby the physical is made to appear one by tossing everyone together and accepting all beliefs as true.  The more beliefs we accept as true, the more we are confused.  The less power we have, the more easily we blindly accept their organizing.  It’s nearly impossible to escape from that web of lies.  Then when we all eventually lose it and kill each other over our beliefs, the remaining elite can create the belief system they want as the only beliefs.  They aren’t going to die in the war because they perceive themselves as separate and above the commotion.  They have special places to go; they’ll go to Mars if they need to.  They are the special ones, the enlightened ones…the illuminated ones.  But if we know they are the false ones, who has the power?

Alinsky’s Democratic Philosophy standards are incredibly low. That’s why Trump finds the Democrats so inauthentic. To him, Alinsky’s minions are fake and dishonest. To the minions, it’s life in the real world; and we should know that “Hope and Change,” or “Stronger Together,” are just words that we aspire to if we get our act together.  But don’t expect such promises; they aren’t promises that they plan to deliver.  Michelle Obama recently said that she no longer has hope.  That’s because Trump blew right past hope; he went straight to change.

Words confuse; the same words in a different context completely alter our perspective. Thus to understand another, we must understand what the other considers real and what they consider illusion.  When we don’t understand another’s illusion, and we follow them, we get their level confusion.

When we follow others, we get their psychological reversals.  We shut off our true desires, if they fall outside of their world view.  We’d get punished if we held on to those true desires and manifested them while we are within the confines of their illusion.  We become afraid of our desires.  Instead we start to want their grand desire for ourselves…fitting in, money, health, or enlightenment all produce a different set of choices in a seemingly different world.  We feel emotional when we disobey the organizer.  Liberals are extremely emotional since Trump was elected President.  That’s because everything he says lives outside the limits of Alinsky’s world.  It seems to them that his words and behavior deserve punishment.  Thus anyone that likes his ideas is deplorable.

It is actually impossible to be desireless.  Most people let others define their North Star.  Even a guru has desires to eat or wear their purposely unfashionable orange robe.  We feel dull and worthless if we don’t move toward our desires; so it is essential that we get our direction right.  So many people are in physical pain because they are tearing themselves apart with desire.  They have a heart’s desire that won’t go away, but they also want to please others.  That’s the mental equivalent of sawing yourself in half.

So we have to keep the physical in the physical.  You don’t have to stop organizing your socks or your desktop.  But if you let go of fear of confusion, or fear of things being a mess, or fear of not being able to find your stuff, you’ll find that you naturally organize things without being OCD.  You don’t naturally pile all your stuff in a corner.  You don’t need your socks to be color coded.  The extremes are always ridiculous.